<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>@andrewchen - Latest Comments in Too many social networking aggregators?</title><link>http://futuristicplay2.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://futuristicplay2.disqus.com/too_many_social_networking_aggregators/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:50:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Too many social networking aggregators?</title><link>http://andrewchen.co/2008/03/10/too-many-social-networking-aggregators/#comment-1843631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not enough by far :P I started a UK equivalent of Digg for numerous reasons. If you build it and people come then there's always a need! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the future if they die out, so what, let the best ones win.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Too many social networking aggregators?</title><link>http://andrewchen.co/2008/03/10/too-many-social-networking-aggregators/#comment-1843630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope. There aren't too many.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not uncommon to have multiple sites serving a single space, and eventually, users gravitate toward the ones with the best experience. Nobody has it 100% nailed, and we should encourage startups to continue to innovate, rather than mocking them. I look forward to more, and can think of many that FriendFeedFeed misses. :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LinkRiver, BlogCatalog and AssetBar come to mind. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:18:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>